Merged
Conversation
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to fa11af0 in 1 minute and 28 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
45lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. lib/rspec/html_messages.rb:3
- Draft comment:
Removed Zeitwerk loading block and replaced it with explicit requires. Make sure to update requires when adding new modules. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =30%<= threshold50%The comment is informative, explaining what was changed and giving a suggestion for future actions. It doesn't ask for confirmation or suggest a specific code change. It doesn't violate any rules directly, but it doesn't provide actionable feedback either.
2. lib/rspec/html_messages/version.rb:5
- Draft comment:
Version bump to 0.2.2 is appropriate for this change. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions. It simply states that the version bump is appropriate, which is not within the scope of useful comments as per the rules.
3. rspec-html_messages.gemspec:28
- Draft comment:
Removed Zeitwerk dependency from gemspec as it’s no longer used; ensure explicit requires cover all needed files. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
Workflow ID: wflow_RGmjVeIYD3hzlFO4
You can customize 
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There were problems using Zeitwerk. This commit removes it to simplify usage.
Important
Remove Zeitwerk and update version to 0.2.2, simplifying code with explicit requires and removing the Zeitwerk dependency.
lib/rspec/html_messages.rband replace with explicitrequirestatements forvalue_formatter,diff_formatter, andtemplate_renderer.zeitwerkdependency fromrspec-html_messages.gemspec.0.2.2inlib/rspec/html_messages/version.rb.This description was created by
for fa11af0. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.